Immigration Lawyer in CA Shares Current Immigration News

By March 12, 2021Immigration Law Blog
Immigration Lawyer in Ca

Immigration lawyer in CA, attorney Franklin Nelson, spends a good deal of time keeping up with recent and proposed changes to immigration law – as an immigration attorney, one would expect nothing less. But today he’s sharing some of the most recent headlines and proposed changes here on the Nelson Immigration Law Blog.

Immigration Lawyer in CA Shares Current Immigration News

The focus of today’s immigration news update is the public charge rule that was published on August 14th, 2019 by The Department of Homeland Security. The law was initially supposed to take effect on October 15th of the same year. Just before the law was set to go into effect, several federal courts stepped in and stopped the Department of Homeland Security from enacting it.

On February 21st, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed the last remaining injunction which allowed the Department of Homeland Security to move forward with enacting the rule.

What is the Public Charge Rule?

The concept behind the public charge rule was established in 1882 by Congress. At this time, the idea was that the public charge rule would allow the United States government to deny a Visa to any person who is likely at any time to become a “public charge.”

Things start to get tricky here since there was no actual definition of what “public charge” meant.

So, when Trump began his on his immigration warpath, he and his administration created their own definition for what a public charge was in an effort to reduce the number of immigrants permitted entry to the country.

 

Since 1999, immigration officers have adopted the guiding principle that a public charge is someone “primarily dependent on the government for subsistence,” as demonstrated by either (a) using public cash assistance for income maintenance or (b) institutionalization for long-term care at government expense. Specifically, this has included:

  • Supplemental Security Income (SSI)
  • Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), commonly known as “welfare”
  • State and local cash assistance, sometimes called “General Assistance”
  • Medicaid or other programs supporting long-term institutionalized care, such as in a nursing home or mental health institution”

[Source]

Under this interpretation of the rule, few immigrants were denied entry to the United States. This is because firstly, green card applicants generally have to have a financial sponsor in order to obtain a green card. This sponsor has to prove that they have income sufficient enough to sustain the person they are sponsoring should the need arise. Secondly, Congress does not permit most immigrants to utilize the welfare system.

Changing The Public Charge Rule

As mentioned above, Trump’s administration decided to broaden the definition of “public charge” in an attempt to reduce the number of immigrants being granted entry to the U.S. Under this new rule, immigrants would be deemed a “public charge” if they accessed any of the following programs for 12-months in total within any 36-month period.

  • All of the status quo benefits list above (SSI, TANF, general assistance, and long-term institutional care)
  • Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), commonly knowns as “Food Stamps”
  • Section 8 housing and rental assistance
  • Federal housing subsidies
  • Nonemergency Medicaid benefits (with exceptions for children under 21, people with disabilities, pregnant women, and mothers within 60 days after giving birth)

Additionally, people who received two benefits in a single month would have to count this as two months.

A significant point of contention here was that there was no law in place that prevented immigrants from taking advantage of the above listed programs, so they were breaking no laws by doing so.

This forced many people to drop out of relief programs out of fear.

The change also determined that someone would be deemed likely to become a public charge for any of the following reasons:

  • Age: Applicants could be denied if they are younger than the minimum age for full-time employment (18), older than the minimum “early retirement age” for social security purposes (61), or otherwise at an age that impacts their “ability to work.”
  • HealthDHS plans to scrutinize any medical condition and assess whether this condition could affect the applicant’s ability to work, potentially expanding the scope of the required medical examination.
  • Family size: Having more children or other dependents could increase the likelihood of a visa denial.
  • Skills DHS plans to determine whether an applicant has “adequate education and skills to either obtain or maintain employment” (if authorized to work), by looking at employment history, high school degree and higher education, “occupational skills, certifications, or licenses,” and proficiency in English or other languages.
  • Financial status: Above and beyond looking at an applicant’s income and assets (see below), DHS plans to assess credit history, credit score, and financial liabilities, plus whether the applicant has private health insurance or enough resources to cover “any reasonably foreseeable medical costs” that could interfere with work or study.

[Source]

Lastly, the policy required that immigrants complete a “Declaration of Self-Sufficiency” (Form I-944) with their green card application. This form required that applicants be able to show a household income of at least 125% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines in order not to be considered at risk of becoming a public charge.

Today’s Headlines

This all happened back during Trump’s presidency and now that Biden is in office he is working hard to undo many of the immigration changes that Trump put into place. One of his first actions has been to declare that the Department of Homeland Security will no longer defend the public charge rule. This change means that effectively the DHS goes back to the previous definition of the public charge and abandons the public charge rule changes implemented by the Trump administration.

Are You Looking For an Immigration Lawyer in CA?

If you are in need of an immigration lawyer in CA who is reputable and has experience in all varieties of immigration legal cases, attorney Nelson at Nelson Immigration Law can help. Start by making an appointment for your initial consultation today by calling 626-683-3451.

Leave a Reply